• Home
  • About
    • Fintech Family
  • Authorisations
    • CASP (MiCAR)
    • Buying & Selling
    • Payments & Emoney >
      • Support Material
  • Crowdfunding
  • Services
    • Regulatory Licences
    • Interim Solutions
    • Training
  • Brexit
    • Brexit Updates
  • Blogs & Insights
  • News
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Fintech Ireland
  • Client Login
  • Home
  • About
    • Fintech Family
  • Authorisations
    • CASP (MiCAR)
    • Buying & Selling
    • Payments & Emoney >
      • Support Material
  • Crowdfunding
  • Services
    • Regulatory Licences
    • Interim Solutions
    • Training
  • Brexit
    • Brexit Updates
  • Blogs & Insights
  • News
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Fintech Ireland
  • Client Login
CompliReg
  • Home
  • About
    • Fintech Family
  • Authorisations
    • CASP (MiCAR)
    • Buying & Selling
    • Payments & Emoney >
      • Support Material
  • Crowdfunding
  • Services
    • Regulatory Licences
    • Interim Solutions
    • Training
  • Brexit
    • Brexit Updates
  • Blogs & Insights
  • News
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Fintech Ireland
  • Client Login

Blogs & Insights

    Author

    Peter Oakes is an experienced anti-financial crime, fintech and board director professional.

    He has served in senior roles at central banks (Ireland & Saudi Arabia) and financial regulators (UK and Australia).

    Peter is an experienced board director of regulated finserv & fintech firms and advisor to regtech firms.

    Archives

    January 2025
    December 2024
    July 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    February 2024
    October 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    June 2019

    Categories

    All
    ACAMS
    AIB
    AML
    Anti Money Laundering
    Anti-money Laundering
    AUSTRAC
    Authorisation
    Bank Of England
    Bank Of Ireland
    Bank Of Lithuania
    BIS Innovation Hub
    Bitcoin
    Blockchain
    Brexit
    Capital Requirements
    CBDC
    Central Bank Of Ireland
    Chambers And Partners
    Compliance
    Consultation
    COVID-19
    Crypto
    CRYPTOASSETS
    Culture
    Cybercrime
    Cyberfraud
    Cyberrisk
    Cyprus
    Data Protection
    Dear CEO Letter
    Digital Assets
    Digital Currencies
    Digital Euro
    EBS
    ECB
    EML
    Emoney
    Enforcement
    Equivalence
    ESMA
    FCA
    Financial Conduct Authority
    Financial Crime
    Finolita Unio
    FinTech
    FintechUK.com
    Fitness & Probity
    FIU Ireland
    FTX
    GDPR
    Individual Accountability
    Insider Dealing
    Insider Trading
    KBC Bank
    Law
    Lithuania
    Map
    MiCA
    MiFID
    Moneycorp
    Money Laundering
    Payments
    Payments System Regulator
    RegTech
    Risk Management
    Sam Bankman-Freid
    Sandbox
    SARs
    SEAR
    Square
    STRs
    Terrorist Financing
    Tracker Mortgage
    Tracker Mortgages
    VASP
    Virtual Assets
    Westpac
    Wirecard

Back to Blog

Central Bank of Ireland lays out its expectations of firms seeking crypto licensing in Ireland

29/5/2024

 
Picture
If you are looking to get authorised under Markets in Crypto Asset Regulation (MiCAR) in Ireland, the Central Bank of Ireland has confirmed (or perhaps reconfirmed in some people's minds) that regulator intends to open its MiCAR authorisation gateway in early QUARTER 3 2024. 

While VASPs operating under the VASP regime prior to 30 December 2024, under MiCAR, will be permitted, post 30 December 2024, to avail of a transitional period enabling them to continue to operate for up to 12 months or until their CASP authorisation is granted or refused, whichever is sooner the CBI says that in respect of firms not yet registered as VASPs its experience is that period of at least ten months is required to conclude the assessment of a VASP application. The CBI says such firms should focus their efforts on preparing for a CASP application (under MiCAR) rather than seeking a VASP registration at this time. 

For those VASPs that have already applied for a registration but have not reached the end point of the process, the CBI will continue to assess these applications and will engage bilaterally with these firms on the progress of their applications.

Following Ramp Swaps (Ireland) Limited's registration as a VASP, the latest such registration in Ireland, there are now 13 registered virtual asset service providers in Ireland and potentially a few more to come. Get in touch with CompliReg and see MiCA Ready if you are looking to get a MiCAR authorisation in Ireland or elsewhere in Europe.
Picture
​Firms looking to get authorised in Ireland as a CASP or registered in near future as a VASP should note the following extracts from a speech today by Gerry Cross, Director for Financial Regulation, Policy and Risk at Blockchain Ireland's excellent event this week (see link at end of article) 

  •  authorisation is a two way process. A successful process depends crucially on the preparation and approach of the applicant.
 
  • key aspects of a successful application, include:
 
  1. TRANSPARENCY: (a) firms should act in a fully transparent and open manner with respect to their proposed application; (b) if an applicant is applying in multiple EU jurisdictions for a MiCAR activity the CBI says the firm must disclose this in its application;
  2. PREPARATION: (a) firms should prepare well and be appropriately resourced to engage with the CBI 'in a comprehensive and timely manner throughout the assessment process'; (b) preparation also means that firms understand the local regulatory environment.
  3. SUPERVISIBILITY: authorised firms should operate with strong local autonomy and be accountable for all aspects of the local entity. Where we identify obstacles to firm’s meeting this expectation, they will not be authorised.
  4. CONSUMER FOCUS: firms should ensure that securing customer interests is at the core of their business. This is particularly the case for retail facing business models. [and remember, a 'consumer' are not just people; it covers certain legal persons too].

Source: Technological innovation and financial regulation – a maturing relationship - Remarks by Gerry Cross, Director for Financial Regulation, Policy and Risk, Wednesday 29th May 2024

​Linkedin Post:  https://www.linkedin.com/posts/peteroakes_micar-virtualasset-activity-7201513163152834560-N6m7
0 Comments
Read More
Back to Blog

ESMA letter to the Council of the European Union on MiCAR Authorisation Infrastructure 17 October 2023

20/10/2023

 
Picture
The announcement in the media that Coinbase is selecting Ireland as its EU regulatory headquarters has sparked quite a lot of discussion in ​crypto regulatory circles.

Myself and a few others have been thinking about similarities between the race for a MiCAR authorisation [either from a standing start or from the position of already being a Virtual Asset Services Provider registrant in the EU] and the race for UK regulated firms needing an EU home post Brexit. In particular, I recall certain member states doing road shows on why a UK regulated firm should choose its country. While in Ireland, when challenged by the representative bodies and gatekeepers about doing more, the Central Bank of Ireland responded in speeches that it was in no one's interest to get involved in a race to the bottom.

Will we not see something similar when it comes to MiCAR?

Just because company A has a VASP registration in EU country A, it could make sense but, it doesn't necessarily follow that it will pursue a MiCAR authorisation in EU country A. That is more so the case, arguably, when they have VASP registrations in EU countries B, C and others (because there is no passporting).

Therefore, and I am already seeing it myself, there are EU countries laying out their stall for your MiCAR authorisation regardless if you are (or not) already registered there as VASP. Some EU countries argue that their current VASP registration (& remember it was only ever intended to be a mere registration) is so robust and already aligned to MiCAR that you will find its offering a fast, efficient & effective way to getting the authorisation crown. I suspect other member states might take a political or supervisor risk-based decision not to exceed their obligations when dealing with a MiCAR authorisation and - potentially adding things into the authorisation process - to unintentionally but effectively killing-off an application.

And, while it is great to hear of a large digital asset player laying down the marker that Ireland will be its EU regulatory home, I have lost count of how may MiFID, emoney and payment firms that have told me that "Ireland is the only country for our company", only to find that their view changes during the course of the authorisation process for whatever reason. I've seen companies apply elsewhere while pursuing an application in Ireland and I have spoken to some of those companies 18 months latter when they discovered the grass wasn't greener in the other EU member state.

Against that backdrop, very interesting to read the Chair (Verna Ross) of European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) letter of 17 October 2023 to Nadia Calviño President of the Economic and Financial Affairs (ECOFIN) Council of the European Union, saying a number of important things about the MiCAR authorisation infrastructure.
Of the many points made by ESMA in its letter, the following ones caught our eye.

 
  1. NCAs (national competent authorities) need to establish as early as possible their supervisory procedures related to the authorisation regimes set out in the MiCA Regulation, including simplified authorisation procedures for entities already authorised to provide crypto-asset services under national law.
  2. each Member State to designate without delay the NCAs responsible for carrying out the functions and duties provided for in the MiCA Regulation.
  3. that NCAs are granted adequate powers and resources to exercise their supervisory, investigative and enforcement responsibilities.
  4. ESMA is concerned that an extensive use of the grand-fathering clause for entities already providing crypto-asset services would weaken the effectiveness of the MiCA rulebook. This is because the clause may allow these entities to continue operating for up to 18 months in accordance with applicable national laws.

  • Copy of ESMA 17 October 2023 letter - HERE
  • Linkedin Post - HERE
The letter was cced to:

* Mairead McGuinness, Commissioner in charge of Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union, European Commission;
* Irene Tinagli, Chair of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament;
* John Berrigan, Director-General, DG Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital
Markets Union, European Commission;
* Thérèse Blanchet, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union
Union;
* Claudia Lindemann, Head of the Secretariat of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European
Parliament
0 Comments
Read More
Back to Blog

EU Council approves MiCA text, proposal moves to Parliament for a vote

6/10/2022

 
Picture
Following the Permanent Representatives’ Committee meeting of 5 October 2022 which endorsed the final compromise text with a view to agreement, the Chair of the Committee (Edita Hrd) has written a letter and Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 (MiCA) to the Chair of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (Irene TINAGLI) saying:

"that, should the European Parliament adopt its position at first reading, in accordance with Article 294 paragraph 3 of the Treaty, in the form set out in the compromise package contained in the Annex to this letter (subject to revision by the legal linguists of both institutions), the Council would, in accordance with Article 294. paragraph 4 of the Treaty, approve the European Parliament's position and the act shall be adopted in the wording which corresponds to the European Parliament's position."

The full legal text of the landmark legislation known as the Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA), alongside a further law to reveal the identity of those making crypto payments.
At a Wednesday meeting (5th October 2022), diplomats representing the bloc's member governments in the EU's Council signed off on the text of laws (see link above) which were the subject of political deals struck in June.

MiCA introduces the first-ever licensing regime for crypto wallets and exchanges to operate across the bloc and imposes reserve requirements on stablecoins that are intended to avoid Terra-style collapses. A separate law on funds transfers requires wallet providers to check their customer's identity, in a bid to cut money laundering.
​
See also CoinDesk Article here
0 Comments
Read More
© CompliReg.com   Dublin 2, Ireland  ph +353 1 639 2971 
|  www.complireg.com  |  officeATcomplireg.com [replace AT with @]

Picture
Photo from Got Credit