• Home
  • About
    • Fintech Family
  • Authorisations
    • CASP (MiCAR)
    • Buying & Selling
    • Payments & Emoney >
      • Support Material
  • Crowdfunding
  • Services
    • Regulatory Licences
    • Interim Solutions
    • Training
  • Brexit
    • Brexit Updates
  • Blogs & Insights
  • News
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Fintech Ireland
  • Client Login
  • Home
  • About
    • Fintech Family
  • Authorisations
    • CASP (MiCAR)
    • Buying & Selling
    • Payments & Emoney >
      • Support Material
  • Crowdfunding
  • Services
    • Regulatory Licences
    • Interim Solutions
    • Training
  • Brexit
    • Brexit Updates
  • Blogs & Insights
  • News
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Fintech Ireland
  • Client Login
CompliReg
  • Home
  • About
    • Fintech Family
  • Authorisations
    • CASP (MiCAR)
    • Buying & Selling
    • Payments & Emoney >
      • Support Material
  • Crowdfunding
  • Services
    • Regulatory Licences
    • Interim Solutions
    • Training
  • Brexit
    • Brexit Updates
  • Blogs & Insights
  • News
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Fintech Ireland
  • Client Login

Blogs & Insights

    Author

    Peter Oakes is an experienced anti-financial crime, fintech and board director professional.

    He has served in senior roles at central banks (Ireland & Saudi Arabia) and financial regulators (UK and Australia).

    Peter is an experienced board director of regulated finserv & fintech firms and advisor to regtech firms.

    Archives

    January 2025
    December 2024
    July 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    February 2024
    October 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    June 2019

    Categories

    All
    ACAMS
    AIB
    AML
    Anti Money Laundering
    Anti-money Laundering
    AUSTRAC
    Authorisation
    Bank Of England
    Bank Of Ireland
    Bank Of Lithuania
    BIS Innovation Hub
    Bitcoin
    Blockchain
    Brexit
    Capital Requirements
    CBDC
    Central Bank Of Ireland
    Chambers And Partners
    Compliance
    Consultation
    COVID-19
    Crypto
    CRYPTOASSETS
    Culture
    Cybercrime
    Cyberfraud
    Cyberrisk
    Cyprus
    Data Protection
    Dear CEO Letter
    Digital Assets
    Digital Currencies
    Digital Euro
    EBS
    ECB
    EML
    Emoney
    Enforcement
    Equivalence
    ESMA
    FCA
    Financial Conduct Authority
    Financial Crime
    Finolita Unio
    FinTech
    FintechUK.com
    Fitness & Probity
    FIU Ireland
    FTX
    GDPR
    Individual Accountability
    Insider Dealing
    Insider Trading
    KBC Bank
    Law
    Lithuania
    Map
    MiCA
    MiFID
    Moneycorp
    Money Laundering
    Payments
    Payments System Regulator
    RegTech
    Risk Management
    Sam Bankman-Freid
    Sandbox
    SARs
    SEAR
    Square
    STRs
    Terrorist Financing
    Tracker Mortgage
    Tracker Mortgages
    VASP
    Virtual Assets
    Westpac
    Wirecard

Back to Blog

EML faces lawsuit over Irish HQ issues - Australian law firm threatens class action in bid for compensation

13/6/2021

 
Picture
How much does an #antimoneylaundering governance investigation cost a #fintech?

Previously noted that Australian EML doesn't expect a #moneylaundering compliance investigation (no allegation of money laundering) into one of its recently acquired Irish acquisitions (PFS Card Services Ireland Limited acquired in a deal worth up to €216.9m) to exceed AUD 2million / €1.27mn this Australian financial year which ends 30 June. However it cannot forecast the cost going into the next nor subsequent years. See https://lnkd.in/eg2cm82 (see previous blogs here).

Well, it looks likely the costs may go higher if a class action by Shine Lawyers begins to bite, with the Aussie law firm looking for investors who bought shares between December 19, 2020, and May 17, 2021, to join its class action.

The law firm says:  
* “EML did not request a trading halt for almost four days after learning of these concerns and then took another 48 hours to inform the market,” says Australian law firm

* “When shareholders invest their money into a company, they do so with the belief that that company will comply with its continuous disclosure obligations.

* “Our claim will allege that EML failed in its obligations, significantly impacting share prices for thousands of investors.”

Read more by Sean Pollock at https://lnkd.in/efTj2dU 

Linkedin Post - 
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/peteroakes_antimoneylaundering-fintech-moneylaundering-activity-6809752916379922432-wNal


0 Comments
Read More
Back to Blog

EML Payments Money Laundering Governance Investigation to cost less than $2mn this financial year

10/6/2021

 
Picture
In my previous post on EML Payments (EML) (see here) we noted that EML had advised that its Irish regulated subsidiary, PFS Card Services (Ireland) Limited ('PCSIL'), had received correspondence from the Central Bank of Ireland ('CBI'), including a letter received on Friday 14 May 2021 (Australian time) raising significant regulatory concerns ('Correspondence'). The CBI's concerns relate to PCSIL's Anti-Money Laundering / Counter Terrorism Financing ('AML/CTF'), risk and control frameworks and governance. The Correspondence states that the CBI is minded to issue directions to PCSIL pursuant to section 45 of the Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013.

A few days ago, EML provided the Australian Stock Exchange with a trading update.  The trading update also included its Quarter 3 FY2021 update in which EML confirmed:

"Current Status:
 
  • EML advised the market on 19 May 2021 that it had received correspondence from the CBI raising significant regulatory concerns (‘Section 45 Letter). EMI responded to the CBI's Section 45 letter within the deadline on 27 Moy 2021. 
  • EMA remains in an ongoing dialogue with the CBI in relation to their concerns through substantial responses, data and access to our teams.  
  • There ie no statutory timeframe for the CBI to finale its consideration of the matters.
  • A project governance structure has been established to assist our local team in Ireland, including subcommittee of the EML Board, members of the EML executive team, external regulatory consultants and legal resources.

Communication:
  • We are working co-operatively with the CBI and it authorised officers.
  • Communications with the CBI are confidential and we will provide updates when appropriote, . 
  • EML is proactively communicating with, and providing information if and when requested, with other regulatory in the regions where EML operates.

Business Impact:  
  • We continue to focus on EMI's strong pipeline of new customers and support out existing customers, yet we are aware that ongoing uncertainty is a risk and a challenge.
  • Immediate one-off costs incurred for legal (Arthur Cox) and professional advisory (PriceWaterhouseCoopers) fees are expected to be less than $2 millon in FY21. In addition, we may see an impact of delayed program launches on establishment income and transaction fees which we cannot quantify at this time.
  • Financial impact for FY22 can not be fully determined at this time." 
 
Some observations:
  • This statement, and in particular the fees, relates to the current financial year for EML which ends on 30 June 2021 and a new financial year starts in Australia for the company on 1 July 2021, i.e. FY22. Thus, as we all know, CBI enquiries and investigations last for many years, so one could expect the 'less than $2 million' figure to go northwards. 
  • There will be costs in terms of management time and that of Board involvement, as EML points out.
  • Furthermore, there is a potential loss of revenue from "an impact of delayed program launches on establishment income and transaction fees which we cannot quantify at this time.

Further reading - EML Payments Q3 FY21 Trading Update June 2021 (dated 7 June 2021)
0 Comments
Read More
Back to Blog

EML Payments Trading Halt  - correspondence from the Central Bank of Ireland raising significant regulatory concerns

19/5/2021

 
Picture
The ASX Market Announcement says:

"EML PAYMENTS LIMITED (ASX: EML) ("EMU') refers to its request for a trading halt dated 17 May 2021.

EML advises that its Irish regulated subsidiary, PFS Card Services (Ireland) Limited ('PCSIL'), has received correspondence from the Central Bank of Ireland ('CBI'), including a letter received on Friday 14 May 2021 (Australian time) raising significant regulatory concerns ('Correspondence'). The CBI is the relevant regulator in Ireland.

The CBI's concerns relate to PCSIL's Anti-Money Laundering / Counter Terrorism Financing ('AML/CTF'), risk and control frameworks and governance. The Correspondence states that the CBI is minded to issue directions to PCSIL pursuant to section 45 of the Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013.

The Correspondence does not concern EML's Australian or North American operations, or the operations of PFS' UK subsidiary ('Prepaid Financial Services Limited' which is incorporated in England and regulated by the FCA), or EML's other Irish regulated subsidiary ('EML Money DAC').
"

ASX Announcement in PDF and at source. 
0 Comments
Read More
© CompliReg.com   Dublin 2, Ireland  ph +353 1 639 2971 
|  www.complireg.com  |  officeATcomplireg.com [replace AT with @]

Picture
Photo from Got Credit